————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
1. Forming a group to fall back on to if things go bad spiritually; a group to protect one (and one’s friends) from outcomes — that exists regardless of nation, socioeconomic status
2. No issue with body death, no compulsion to report
3. Retention of current memory across lifetimes
4. Exterior, or able to exteriorize without issue
5. Able to Assume bodies without issue
6. A friendly space in which to meet others that want to go free, support others and be supported by others.
7. A willingness to want to free others, regardless of the group, or teachings.
8. Full perception while exterior
9. A feeling of safety and calmness
10. In control of automatic responses, or not having automatic responses
11. Somewhat better memory of current life
12. Does not have destructive intentions or evil purposes
13. Has a relatively healthy body or sense of form
For the main goals, there are direct processes for these also.
2. No issue with body death, no compulsion to report - 1-9
3. Retention of current memory across lifetimes - 16
4. Exterior, or able to exteriorize without issue - 1-8
5. Able to Assume bodies without issue - TODO, might be a practical thing someone can try themselves
7. A willingness to want to free others, regardless of the group, or teachings. - TODO
8. Full perception while exterior - 17
9. A feeling of safety and calmness - Many processes, we can make a more specific one
10. In control of automatic responses, or not having automatic responses - Many processes, we can make a more specific one
11. Somewhat better memory of current life - TODO
12. Does not have destructive intentions or evil purposes - TODO
13. Has a relatively healthy body or sense of form - TODO
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
We want 100% of our members to achieve these states. We also want all of our members to achieve their own dreams, e.g., being a good singer; being a good business manager; being able to have a healthy marriage, etc.
But we won’t lie - the above 13 points are the main goals of what we do. And we are very good at bringing these about. We improve someone spiritually to achieve these states. We do this just by getting someone to change their mind or confront some are they are not inclined to look at or confront.
We can help you with just about anything - any problem, any goal, any wish, any dream. But be grounded and don’t expect too much - this, studies show, is one of the main qualities of people who are happy - not expecting too much, or some weird idea.
We can make you immortal (you already are, but we can show it to you, and make you certain of it). But we can’t “force” you to be a good singer, or to be rich, or be wealthy. We are blatantly honest.
However, using your new ability that we bring about, it is very possible that those conditions or achievements could be attained.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Mores, About
The odd thing is that current society’s mores are such as they are.
Anyone, when they would be considering a group that would truly help them and lead to permanent states of improved being, would be given two choices by society itself
These are -
1) The choice of freedom (by the associating with the group, driven by oneself)
2) Chaotic Confusion. This would include essentially every reaction and emotion, all not thought out very well. This would include Destruction, evil purposes, destructive intentions
In another system, insanity is defined as (referenced here in Fair Use) - “INSANITY IS THE OVERT OR COVERT BUT ALWAYS COMPLEX AND CONTINUOUS DETERMINATION TO HARM OR DESTROY.”
This is a very good, and very accurate, definition of Insanity. Also of evil. This definition defines insanity with the words “complex” and “continuous.”
For some reason people can pre-suppose that the person is supposed to follow the chaos, which would include complex and continuous impulses of all kinds.
This, necessarily, would then mean the person “should” be connected to destructiveness and be destructive themselves.
But it is very possible to not be pro destructive groups at all, or destructive actions at all.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
What is a destructive group, action or lifestyle?
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
A group, action or lifestyle in which the being is not aware of where, what or how they are.
Or a group, action or lifestyle which promotes, condones or mandates this condition.
Put differently, it is one which condones or mandates unawareness and disability of the being.
This is our working definition, and can be used by others as well. All such destructive groups, actions and lifestyles aren’t particularly worth supporting.
Conversely, a group, action or lifestyle which promotes or enables beings to know who, what and how they are, is very worthwhile and very worth supporting.
A destructive group, action or lifestyle could be one which gives a false idea, like to worship a figure, instead of knowing where and how one is.
Instead of knowing where and how one is, people are often given false “solutions” of prayer, drugs, power dynamics, etc. Such are actually destructive groups and lifestyles.
By feeling Safer, it is quite possible to snap out of “automatic destructiveness” or previous destructive agreements.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
But realize what one is dealing with. The society at large is filled with a bunch of destructive organizations and cults. People don’t even know what, where, or often, that, they are.
Understanding Exterior ontology is quite important. It’s not enough to read about psychics or whatever. One needs to actually know where what, one, and how, one is.
This is the baseline of normalcy. This is why we thoroughly target this. We use our SOP. This is listed below.
This is one of the foundational points of our ethics. You have got to have someone know who, what and how they are.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
What is actually true. For now, this is a working hypothesis. All truths in our movement, we wish to extensively prove and document them, within reason (and without making anyone unsafe).
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
You are an immortal soul. You are not your body. Your capabilities are unlimited. You are the source and cause of reality - your universe (thoughts and creations), and also the universe around you (the physical universe). These are separate.
You have been lied to and shackled and chained to bodies and been told that you are a body in previous spiritual experience in this universe and previous ones. You’ve lived a long time. Your ability has been tremendously reduced. Eastern traditions - Hindu and Buddhist cosmology, etc. - often think there have been trillions of years in the past. This duration is basically accurate.
Your ability has never decreased, only willingness to do things has.
You’ve been told by heavy “conditioning” (implanting) through advanced tech and such means in ancient, arcane places that you are a body and to be a slave. This happened many, many, many different times. This can be readily experienced. This exists, much of it, in mental mass form around the body, or in mental mass that comes in, near or inside the body, if “triggered” (restimulated). The prospect of “freedom” or “control” readily makes this stuff “kick in” hard. This can be easily experienced.
For anything, one is either at Cause (a state of causing or being able or willing to potentially Cause things); or is at Effect (has no control, acts like a victim, has no awareness, etc., the Effect of things).
The extent to which one is at Cause is a spectrum - a gradient scale. One finds people have very little Causativeness over this stuff usually. The stuff makes them only be lowly mad “Homo Sapiens.”
The events you have experienced are recorded as “facsimiles” – copies of the events that happen, with full perceptions and concepts. These are continually recorded normally by the mind. They are very light pictures, they have physical weight in the physical universe. The slave-making events and incidents, designed to trap you and make you human, are also facsimiles. But they are heavy. They exist as ridges (basically, tangled up energy masses).
Without the “help” of these heavy facsimiles, it is likely that you can step outside of your body somewhat stably and exist just as yourself.
There can be great, great relief in handling these incidents. For freedom is within grasp.
So long as you are not shackled down and are willing to reach for it.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
What we do
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
We do what we call “Processes.”
Processes are techniques, often applied in a group setting, to “turn on” some kind of spiritual or mental phenomena, or to drill or train ability to a higher level.
Some processes might focus on handling negative things. These involve “turning on” and “turning off” some kind of mental charge or factor. For example, a heavy incident. Some processes might focus on putting into being a positive state, like Intelligence.
If you have high-level spiritual experiences or experiences of your true or broad identity, it is important not to suppress that, even if it doesn’t conform to “popular” viewpoints. If you have an experience of a past life, etc., be more than willing to support a broad epistemology. You don’t need to constantly try to invalidate your own memory or own thoughts. Eventually, your memory will be straightened out in the end.
We support the individual finding out the truth for themselves. We support academic work, university studies, skepticism, inquiry, rebellious dispositions, and unique perspectives. We strongly encourage a person to maintain the version of knowledge that they experience firsthand, and not try to “fit in” to what others think.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Our background.
We are a new religion. We have no direct predecessor, we are not a sect. We are striving to find and tell Full Truth in the present time, right now.
Much like Islam can mention Christians or Christianity, or Sikhism is influenced from Islam and Hinduism, we also have inspirations.
While we are wholly and utterly ourself, and are not a branch of anything, there is a lot of wisdom and truth in Scientology.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Intro Processes -
1.
Freak out about X
(Said after a random amount of time.)
Don’t freak out
2.
How does money seem to you now?
How does help seem to you now?
How does time seem to you now?
High level considerations
Probably fast to change ones mind and make oneself like this
Who is telling you to be in a body? => Psychologists, psychiatrists, materialists, Implanters, psychs controlling the society, etc. => Just me, I'm the only one telling me to be in a body
Who is telling you that the body is more interesting than the exterior world? => Only I am, and no one else
Body control
I don't NEED TO control the body. There is no obession or compulsion or requirement to move it. I can protest moving it completely.
I don't need to control or not control the body. I am likely interested in the body, but I don't need to CONTROL it. Control will come naturally, without needing there to be attention on the body to control or not control it.
I can control it very thoroughly if I desire to
Attention
I can span attention on any body parts, and broaden that attention to include other body parts. I can broaden attention past the body.
The body is in good form. It's not crippled or in bad state.
The body is not stopping me from locating myself.
The body could become another form and I wouldn't mind.
The body could be hurt and I wouldn't mind (from body generated pain).
The body is less interesting than the exterior world.
The body could be volatile and I wouldn't mind (being shaken, trembling, etc.)
I am not “from” the body. Where are you from? => “Here” / “Right from where I am.” “Where is that?” => “Only where I say I am and no other place”
I will inevitably lose control of the current body, but that is okay and doesn't matter at all. I will still be able to control past (if not totally decomposed and gone), present and possibly future bodies at any moment. Such ability cannot go away.
Bodies are never lost. You don't have “loss” from a body dying. Not ones own, not another. Others also don't have loss from a body dying.
I can see just fine without the body's eyes. “Perceptionness” cannot ever go away.
“Body utility,” whatever that would mean, cannot go away.
I can conceive a static easily, and so can others.
The idea that someone would ever lose something if they conceived a static a very low order idea.
I love the exterior world.
My body could suddenly become something else and I wouldn't care.
I am okay with any distance from me to any part of my body, and any distance from any part of my body to me.
I am okay with 100 feet + from my head to me.
I am okay with 100 feet + from me to my head.
I don’t need to force the body into anything.
I can make by body wait until it dies.
The sensation of the body can be volatile.
The sensation of the body can be still.
The sensation of the body can fluctuate in volatility.
TODO Interest, location
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Safety Org - SOP
The goal of this is to change a ton of considerations of the being to get them stably exterior, quickly and directly.
We want to exteriorize them, which has much to do with symbols (approval from bodies on the high end, needing bodies and going into worshipping bodies on the low end).
The intimate "problem in exteriorization" (if there is one) is essentially one of symbols.
We believe that if someone obsessively reinteriorizes all the time, something here is probably not done properly. And no one does this, so it is novel.
One exterior, they should be immediately made to look at things, and then interiorize into things and exteriorize from things.
----------
1. Spotting spots in space. This can help with exteriorization.
1. Spot a spot in space.
2. Making being in control of emotioning to know to waiting to know and controlling bodies to being objects.
Makes the being aware who they are even doing it for, giving them control of what they are doing with their emotions and knowingness
Possibly simplifies their life, makes apparent old games or purposes, makes them more sane, less compulsive
Might exteriorize them by itself
2. Who are you emoting for?
3. Who are you controlling bodies for?
4. Who are you efforting for?
5. Who are you protecting bodies for?
6. Who are you owning bodies for?
7. Who are you thinking for?
8. Who are you getting approval from bodies for?
9. Who are you needing bodies for?
10. Who are you symbolizing for?
11. Who are you trying to show things to?
12. Who are you worshipping bodies for?
13. Who are you eating for?
14. Who are you sacrificing for?
15. Who are you sexing for?
16. Who are you hiding for?
17. Who are you being in mystery for?
18. Who are you being objects for?
19. Who are you waiting for?
3. Handles approval from bodies, needing bodies, symbols and worse things
Handles obsessive interiorization, could exteriorize someone by itself
20. Don't show to anyone that your body has use.
21. Don't show to anyone that your body is healthy.
22. Don't show to anyone that your body is surviving.
23. Don't show to anyone that your body is stable.
24. Don't show to anyone that your body has overcome damage.
25. Don't show to anyone that your body has overcome confusion.
26. Don't show to anyone that your body has overcome pain.
4. By mock ups (well, mock ups of getting rid of things), gets the person able to get rid of what he feels he "needs".
Could be very useful. Could exteriorize someone by itself.
27. Get rid of a useful body.
28. Get rid of a non-useful body.
29. Get rid of a surviving body.
30. Get rid of a non-surviving body.
31. Get rid of a stable body.
32. Get rid of a non-stable body.
33. Get rid of a body that has overcome damage.
34. Get rid of a body that has not overcome damage.
35. Get rid of a body that has overcome confusion.
36. Get rid of a body that has not overcome confusion.
37. Get rid of a body that has overcome pain.
38. Get rid of a body that has not overcome pain.
5. Materialism is the huge lie. This allows someone to get rid of things.
39. Get rid of the mass of materialism.
40. Get rid of the meaning of materialism.
41. Get rid of the mobility of materialism.
42. Get rid of materialism.
43. Get rid of materialism in many ways.
44. Waste materialism.
45. Keep the table from going away.
46. Try not to be 10 feet back of your head.
6. Gets rid of symbols. This is the problem in exteriorization. It is intimate.
Also get the person to determine orientation points. So we don't just get rid of symbols.
47. Get rid of the mass of your name.
48. Get rid of the meaning of your name.
49. Get rid of the mobility of your name.
50. Notice an object and tell it out loud where it is.
51. Keep the table from going away.
52. Try not to be 10 feet back of your head.
53. Get rid of the mass of your body.
54. Get rid of the meaning of your body.
55. Get rid of the mobility of your body.
56. Notice an object and tell it out loud where it is.
57. Keep the table from going away.
58. Try not to be 10 feet back of your head.
59. Get rid of the mass of your family.
60. Get rid of the meaning of your family.
61. Get rid of the mobility of your family.
62. Notice an object and tell it out loud where it is.
63. Keep the table from going away.
64. Try not to be 10 feet back of your head.
65. Get rid of the mass of a city you used to live in.
66. Get rid of the meaning of a city you used to live in.
67. Get rid of the mobility of a city you used to live in.
68. Notice an object and tell it out loud where it is.
69. Keep the table from going away.
70. Try not to be 10 feet back of your head.
71. Get rid of the mass of your country.
72. Get rid of the meaning of your country.
73. Get rid of the mobility of your country.
74. Notice an object and tell it out loud where it is.
75. Keep the table from going away.
76. Try not to be 10 feet back of your head.
77. Get rid of the mass of pain.
78. Get rid of the meaning of pain.
79. Get rid of the mobility of pain.
80. Notice an object and tell it out loud where it is.
81. Keep the table from going away.
82. Try not to be 10 feet back of your head.
83. Get rid of the mass of drugs.
84. Get rid of the meaning of drugs.
85. Get rid of the mobility of drugs.
86. Notice an object and tell it out loud where it is.
87. Keep the table from going away.
88. Try not to be 10 feet back of your head.
89. Get rid of the mass of hypnosis.
90. Get rid of the meaning of hypnosis.
91. Get rid of the mobility of hypnosis.
92. Notice an object and tell it out loud where it is.
93. Keep the table from going away.
94. Try not to be 10 feet back of your head.
95. How are you separate from your name?
96. How is your name separate from you?
97. Tell me some names you can get rid of.
98. Tell me some bodies you can get rid of.
7. Get rid of different methods of knowingness. This probably helps with exteriorization.
99. Tell me some mystery you could get rid of.
100. Tell me some eating you could get rid of.
101. Tell me some symbols you could get rid of.
102. Tell me some thinking you could get rid of.
103. Tell me some emotion you could get rid of.
8. The idea is that unknowableness or similar very low emotions, could act as stable data in a confusion, the stable datum being that many things about
the object or thing are NOT KNOWN. This could give one a sense of calm, and could help to exteriorize someone.
104. Spot some unknowableness.
105. Spot some more unknowableness.
106. Spot some more unknowableness.
107. Instantly Spot some unknowableness.
108. What confusion could unknowableness solve?
109. What other confusion could unknowableness solve?
9. Here we are putting someone in control of low order methods of knowingness. We are making them not do a method of knowingness. This can help with exteriorization.
110. Spot a spot in space and don't effort.
111. Spot a spot in space and don't mystery.
112. Spot a spot in space and don't symbolize.
113. Spot a spot in space where there is no effort.
114. Get rid of Effort in your mind.
115. Get rid of Effort in your body.
116. Spot 3 spots in space where there is no effort.
117. Spot 3 spots in your body there is no effort.
118. How much Effort could there be in locating yourself?
119. How much Effort could there not be in locating yourself?
120. Spot a spot in space where there is no thinking.
121. Get rid of Thinking in your mind.
122. Get rid of Thinking in your body.
123. Spot 3 spots in space where there is no thinking.
124. Spot 3 spots in your body there is no thinking.
125. How much Effort could there be in locating yourself?
126. How much Effort could there not be in locating yourself?
127. How much Thinking could there be in locating yourself?
128. How much Thinking could there not be in locating yourself?
129. What would happen if you were ten feet back of your head without effort?
130. What would happen if you were ten feet back of your head without symbols?
131. What would happen if you were ten feet back of your head without thinking?
132. What would happen if you were ten feet back of your head without eating?
10. Here we are changing considerations of control. Lack of Control can impede (or suppress) exteriorization.
133. Who could control your body?
134. Who could your body control?
135. Who could control your head?
136. Who could your head control?
11. One is trapped by those things to which he will not "grant havingness" (freely allowing to affect or potentially affect things or oneself, essentially).
The basic havingness that the being is denying the trap is denying the trap a being.
Since the body is kind of a trap (or at least one kind of thinks it is or is acting kind of life one), allowing ones body to get taken over etc. can help with exteriorization.
137. Name me ten beings that you could allow your body to take over.
138. Name me ten beings that you could allow to take over your body.
139. Name me ten beings that you could allow your body to control.
140. Name me ten beings that you could allow to control your body.
141. Be ten feet back of your head.
12. This leads to substitutes, which is easy, low order, and can handle issues with stable data or with confusions. This can help with exteriorization.
142. Look around here and find a subtitute for your body.
143. Look around here and find a substitute for your head.
144. Look around here and find a substitute for the confusion of your entire life.
145. Look around here and find a substitute for the confusion of the last few days.
146. Look around here and find a substitute for your current location.
147. Look around here and find a substitute for your living a life.
148. Look around here and find a substitute for dealing with a body.
149. Look around here and find a substitute for all the pain your body has ever felt.
150. Look around here and find a substitute for all the pain your body could feel.
151. Look around here and find a substitute for all the hunger your body could feel.
13. We improve control of stable data or with confusions. This can help with exteriorization.
152. How confusing could your body be?
153. How stable could your body be?
154. How confusing could the physical universe be?
155. How stable could the physical universe be?
14. We address effort, which can be a huge button for people (compulsive sensation or touching to know or believe the existence of something, everything being "work", everything being "difficult", constant conflict)
This can help with exteriorization
156. How much effort could there be in being in a body?
157. How much effort could there be in not being in a body?
158. How little effort could there be in being in a body?
159. How little effort could there be in not being in a body?
15. Using body to give confidence in location. This can help with exteriorization
160. How could your head give you confidence in awareness of location?
161. How could your head give you confidence in unawareness of location?
162. How could your head make it easy to have awareness of location?
163. How could your head make it easy to have unawareness of location?
16. Using body to give solution of location. This can help with exteriorization
164. How could your head be a solution for awareness of location?
165. How could your head be a solution for unawareness of location?
17. Separation. Exteriorization = Separation
166. What separation would be miserable?
167. What separation wouldn't be miserable?
18. Connectedness. This can help with exteriorization
168. Look around here and tell me something that could connect with you.
169. Look around here and tell me something that could connect with your body.
19. Interest relates to interiorization. This can help with exteriorization
170. Who would be interested in a separate being?
20. More separation. This can help with exteriorization
171. Name three different people.
172. How separate could you be to them?
173. How separate could they be to you?
21. Separation from materialism. This can obviously help with exteriorization
174. What would happen if you separated from materialism?
175. What would happen if another separated from materialism?
176. What would happen if others separated from materialism?
177. What would happen if materialism separated from you?
22. Dealing with loss. This can help with exteriorization
178. How is the idea that someone would ever lose something if they conceived a static a very low order idea?
179. What would another not lose if they conceived a static?
180. When would they not lose it?
181. What would others not lose if they conceived a static?
182. When would they not lose it?
183. What would you not lose if you conceived a static?
184. When would you not lose it?
185. What other person's thing would you lose if you conceived a static?
186. When would you lose it?
187. What other person's thing would you not lose if you conceived a static?
188. When would you not lose it?
189. Why do others not want you to conceive a static?
190. Why do you not want others to conceive a static?
191. Why do others not want others to conceive a static?
192. Why do you not want yourself to conceive a static?
23. More separation and spotting spots and interest. This can help with exteriorization
193. Spot 3 parts of the body that are separate.
194. Spot 3 spots in the universe that are separate.
195. Spot 2 parts of the body that are separate.
196. Spot 2 spots in the universe that are separate.
197. Spot 2 spots in the universe that are both separate and interesting.
198. Spot 3 parts of the body that you are separate from.
199. Spot 3 spots in the universe that you are separate from.
200. Spot 2 parts of the body that you are separate from.
201. Spot 2 spots in the universe that you are separate from.
202. Spot 3 spots in the universe that you are separate from.
203. Spot 3 spots in the universe that are interesting.
204. How interesting could separating from the body be?
205. How uninteresting could a separated-from-body be?
206. How is your body separate from the rest of the physical universe?
207. How is the rest of the physical universe separate from your body?
208. How are you separate from your head?
209. How is your head separate from you?
210. Notice two separate objects.
211. How separate could they possibly be?
212. How miserable could being separate from your head seem?
213. How pleasant could being separate from your head seem?
24. Dealing with control and existence. This can help with exteriorization
214. How are you inevitably not going to lose all control of the body?
215. How are you inevitably going to lose all control of the body?
216. How will control always exist?
217. How are you inevitably not going to lose all perception from the body?
218. How are you inevitably going to lose all perception from the body?
219. How will perception always exist?
220. How can your perceptionness not be lost?
221. How are you inevitably not going to lose all utility from the body?
222. How are you inevitably going to lose all utility from the body?
223. How will utility always exist?
25. Dealing with safety. This can help with exteriorization
224. Where would be unsafe now?
225. Where would be safe now?
26. Dealing with location. This can help with exteriorization
226. Where aren't you now?
227. Where needn't you be now?
228. Where is an easy location to be now?
229. Where is a pleasant location to be now?
230. Where are you not from?
231. Tell me about it.
232. Are you certain you're not from there?
27. Dealing with interest. This can help with exteriorization
233. How do you not have interest on the exterior world?
234. How do you not have attention on the exterior world?
235. What do you love about the nature of the exterior world?
236. What about the exterior world would you love to look at?
237. What about the exterior world is more interesting than the body?
28. Dealing with body form. This can help with exteriorization
238. How much could you allow the body to grow or shrink in the next 5 minutes?
239. How incompetent can you allow your body control to be?
240. How sloppy can you allow your body control to be?
29. More dealing with control. This can help with exteriorization
241. How can you protest and utterly stop controlling the body at all?
30. Dealing with sensation. This can help with exteriorization
242. How does the body give you pain?
243. How does the body not give you pain?
244. Where could you be where the body is giving you pain?
245. Where could you be where the body is not giving you pain?
246. How does the body's pain affect your location?
247. How does the body's pain not affect your location?
248. How could you locate yourself?
249. What could you use to locate yourself?
250. Why is it okay for your location to not be affected by the body's pain?
251. How are you fundamentally different from pain?
252. How is pain fundamentally different from you?
31. Spanning attention. This can help with exteriorization
253. Put your attention on the body's pain.
254. Widen your attention beyond the body's pain.
255. Widen your attention even further.
32. Body form as a solution. This can help with exteriorization
256. What would a really good physical form be a solution to?
257. What would a really good physical form not be a solution to?
258. What would a body be a solution to?
259. Is this the best solution?
33. Allowing oneself to exist. This can help with exteriorization
260. How wouldn't another allow you to exist?
261. How wouldn't you allow another to exist?
262. How wouldn't others allow others to exist?
263. How wouldn't you allow yourself to exist?
34. More separation. This can help with exteriorization
264. Who wouldn't allow you to separate from them?
265. Who wouldn't you allow to separate from you?
266. How could your head be separate from itself?
267. How are you separate from yourself?
268. How are you separate from another?
269. How is another separate from you?
270. How is another separate from others?
Reference, possible (not 100% full exteriorization technique list)
List of all exteriorization techniques (not complete)
Possible Best ones ranked
1. Symbols related things
2. Where are you from? (or aren't)
3. Safety
4. Interest/attention on the exterior environment
5. Spanning attention
6. Easy/pleasant location
7. Handling body consideration
Techniques that have existed before
Exterior from mockups
Assertive location commands. (Be 3 feet back of your head. Try not to be 3 feet back of your head.)
Spot spots in space
Exteriorize from spots
Where are you from?
Spanning attention
Exteriorization by Distance
Exteriorization by Distance ("How close" variant)
Exteriorization by Distance (Nothing / Something)
Safety
Beingness processing (self identifying with an object)
Holding spots/anchor points
Interest/attention on the exterior environment
Conceving a static
Accept/Reject
Keep head from going away
Loss
Control (Can and can't)
Where you're not located
Int/Ext handling of some form
Handling body consideration
Handling negative case
Things you're separate from
Having other things connect with you
Granting havingness
Substitutes
Possibly new techniques
Easy/pleasant location
What is worse than exteriorizing?
How could you trap yourself?
Exteriorization by intelligence (new idea)
Duplicating exteriorization inhibition
Duplicating exteriorization inhibition by section (What can't you duplicate)
As-ising exteriorization inhibition
Exteriorization by non-interference with current game
All/no attention on X
Where could you be located
Not relative to you
Where aren't you now?
Easy to be located / difficult to be located
What could you use to locate yourself?
Making being in control of emotioning to know to waiting to know and controlling bodies to being objects.
Handles approval from bodies, needing bodies, symbols and worse things
By mock ups (well, mock ups of getting rid of things), gets the person able to get rid of what he feels he "needs".
Materialism is the huge lie. This allows someone to get rid of things.
Gets rid of symbols. This is the problem in exteriorization. It is intimate.
Get rid of different methods of knowingness. This probably helps with exteriorization.
The idea is that unknowableness or similar very low emotions, could act as stable data in a confusion, the stable datum being that many things about
Here we are putting someone in control of low order methods of knowingness. We are making them not do a method of knowingness. This can help with exteriorization.
Here we are changing considerations of control. Lack of Control can impede (or suppress) exteriorization.
improving control of stable data or with confusions.
Addressing effort, which can be a huge button for people
Using body to give confidence in location.
Using body to give solution of location.
Separation from materialism.
Dealing with control and existence.
Dealing with location.
Dealing with body form.
Dealing with sensation.
Body form as a solution.
Allowing oneself to exist.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
1. Safety across life
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
1-1
1. Is your body safe?
2. Tell me about it.
1-2
1. Is your universe safe?
2. Tell me about it.
1-3
1. Is your body safe for you?
2. Tell me about it.
1-4
1. Is the physical universe safe?
2. Tell me about it.
1-5
1. Are you safe?
2. Tell me about it.
1-6
1. Get the idea you have an issue with loss.
2. Get the idea you have no issue with loss.
1-7
1. Is your head fully safe?
2. Tell me about it.
1-8
The most direct way of exteriorizing someone is to repeatedly have them keep their head from going away.
This is because they have a consideration that the head or the body or something is keeping them from going away, so this balances it.
Any trap “keeps someone from going away.”
1-8-0
1. Why is it okay for your head to go away?
2. Why is it okay to go away from your head?
3. Why is it not okay for your head to go away?
4. Why is it not okay to go away from your head?
Sleep,
Love, Sources, Control, Stoppedness, Loss, Vitality, Depression, sadness, inertness, deadness, introversion
normalcy, weirdness
1-8-1
How could X keep you from going away?
How could you keep X from going away?
But, this is much cleaner.
1. How could a head keep you from going away?
2. How could you keep a head from going away?
3. How could a head trap you?
4. How could you trap a head?
5. How could a head keep another from going away?
6. How could another keep a head from going away?
7. How could a head trap another?
8. How could another trap a head?
9. How could heads keep others from going away?
10. How could others keep heads from going away?
11. How could others by trapped by heads?
12. How could others trap heads?
13. How could you keep yourself from going away with a head?
14. How could you keep yourself from going away?
15. How could you trap yourself with a head?
16. How could you trap yourself?
17. How could a head trap itself?
18. How could a head hold you still?
19. How could you keep a head still?
20. How could a head hold another still?
21. How could another hold a head still?
22. How could heads hold others still?
23. How could others hold heads still?
24. How could you hold yourself still?
25. How could a head hold itself still?
1-8.4
1. How could a universe keep you from going away?
2. How could you keep a universe from going away?
3. How could a universe trap you?
4. How could you trap a universe?
5. How could a universe keep another from going away?
6. How could another keep a universe from going away?
7. How could a universe trap another?
8. How could another trap a universe?
9. How could universes keep others from going away?
10. How could others keep universes from going away?
11. How could others by trapped by universes?
12. How could others trap universes?
13. How could you keep yourself from going away with a universe?
14. How could you keep yourself from going away?
15. How could you trap yourself with a universe?
16. How could you trap yourself?
17. How could a universe trap itself?
18. How could a universe hold you still?
19. How could you keep a universe still?
20. How could a universe hold another still?
21. How could another hold a universe still?
22. How could universes hold others still?
23. How could others hold universes still?
24. How could you hold yourself still?
25. How could a universe hold itself still?
1-8.5
1. How could a mind keep you from going away?
2. How could you keep a mind from going away?
3. How could a mind trap you?
4. How could you trap a mind?
5. How could a mind keep another from going away?
6. How could another keep a mind from going away?
7. How could a mind trap another?
8. How could another trap a mind?
9. How could minds keep others from going away?
10. How could others keep minds from going away?
11. How could others by trapped by minds?
12. How could others trap minds?
13. How could you keep yourself from going away with a mind?
14. How could you keep yourself from going away?
15. How could you trap yourself with a mind?
16. How could you trap yourself?
17. How could a mind trap itself?
18. How could a mind hold you still?
19. How could you keep a mind still?
20. How could a mind hold another still?
21. How could another hold a mind still?
22. How could minds hold others still?
23. How could others hold minds still?
24. How could you hold yourself still?
25. How could a mind hold itself still?
1-8.6
1. How could a society keep you from going away?
2. How could you keep a society from going away?
3. How could a society trap you?
4. How could you trap a society?
5. How could a society keep another from going away?
6. How could another keep a society from going away?
7. How could a society trap another?
8. How could another trap a society?
9. How could societies keep others from going away?
10. How could others keep society from going away?
11. How could others by trapped by societies?
12. How could others trap societies?
13. How could you keep yourself from going away with a society?
14. How could you keep yourself from going away?
15. How could you trap yourself with a society?
16. How could you trap yourself?
17. How could a society trap itself?
18. How could a society hold you still?
19. How could you keep a society still?
20. How could a society hold another still?
21. How could another hold a society still?
22. How could societies hold others still?
23. How could others hold societies still?
24. How could you hold yourself still?
25. How could a society hold itself still?
1-8.7
1. How could a planet keep you from going away?
2. How could you keep a planet from going away?
3. How could a planet trap you?
4. How could you trap a planet?
5. How could a planet keep another from going away?
6. How could another keep a planet from going away?
7. How could a planet trap another?
8. How could another trap a planet?
9. How could planets keep others from going away?
10. How could others keep planets from going away?
11. How could others by trapped by planets?
12. How could others trap planets?
13. How could you keep yourself from going away with a planet?
14. How could you keep yourself from going away?
15. How could you trap yourself with a planet?
16. How could you trap yourself?
17. How could a planet trap itself?
18. How could a planet hold you still?
19. How could you keep a planet still?
20. How could a planet hold another still?
21. How could another hold a planet still?
22. How could planets hold others still?
23. How could others hold planets still?
24. How could you hold yourself still?
25. How could a planet hold itself still?
1-8.8
1. How could fairness keep you from going away?
2. How could you keep fairness from going away?
3. How could fairness trap you?
4. How could you trap fairness?
5. How could fairness keep another from going away?
6. How could another keep fairness from going away?
7. How could fairness trap another?
8. How could another trap fairness?
9. How could fairnesss keep others from going away?
10. How could others keep fairnesss from going away?
11. How could others by trapped by fairnesss?
12. How could others trap fairnesss?
13. How could you keep yourself from going away with fairness?
14. How could you keep yourself from going away?
15. How could you trap yourself with fairness?
16. How could you trap yourself?
17. How could fairness trap itself?
18. How could fairness hold you still?
19. How could you keep fairness still?
20. How could fairness hold another still?
21. How could another hold fairness still?
22. How could fairnesss hold others still?
23. How could others hold fairnesss still?
24. How could you hold yourself still?
25. How could fairness hold itself still?
1-8.9
1. How could drugginess keep you from going away?
2. How could you keep drugginess from going away?
3. How could drugginess trap you?
4. How could you trap drugginess?
5. How could drugginess keep another from going away?
6. How could another keep drugginess from going away?
7. How could drugginess trap another?
8. How could another trap drugginess?
9. How could heads keep others from going away?
10. How could others keep heads from going away?
11. How could others by trapped by heads?
12. How could others trap heads?
13. How could you keep yourself from going away with drugginess?
14. How could you keep yourself from going away?
15. How could you trap yourself with drugginess?
16. How could you trap yourself?
17. How could drugginess trap itself?
18. How could drugginess hold you still?
19. How could you keep drugginess still?
20. How could drugginess hold another still?
21. How could another hold drugginess still?
22. How could heads hold others still?
23. How could others hold heads still?
24. How could you hold yourself still?
25. How could drugginess hold itself still?
1-8.10
1. Keep your head from going away.
2. What is worse than exteriorizing?
3. How much worse is it?
4. Clearly explain your thought process.
1-9
1. What's the worst condition to your head you could tolerate happening in 1 year?
2. What's the worst condition to yourself you could tolerate happening in 1 year?
3. What's the worst location to your head you could tolerate happening in 1 year?
4. What's the worst location you could tolerate relocated to in 1 year?
5. What's the worst condition to your head you could tolerate happening in 1 minute?
6. What's the worst condition to yourself you could tolerate happening in 1 minute?
7. What's the worst location to your head you could tolerate happening in 1 minute?
8. What's the worst location you could tolerate relocated to in 1 minute?
9. What's the worst condition to your head you could tolerate happening in 1 second?
10. What's the worst condition to yourself you could tolerate happening in 1 second?
11. What's the worst location to your head you could tolerate happening in 1 second?
12. What's the worst location you could tolerate relocated to in 1 second?
13. What's the worst condition to your head you could tolerate happening right now?
14. What's the worst condition to yourself you could tolerate happening right now?
15. What's the worst location to your head you could tolerate happening right now?
16. What's the worst location you could tolerate relocated to right now?
17. How does being jolted out of your head seem to you now?
18. How does being jolted into your head seem to you now?
1-10
1. Grab your head with your hands.
2. Keep your head from going away.
3. Did it go away?
4. Do you expect it to remain in place in one hour?
5. What would make it go away?
6. Are you relative to it?
7. How does controlling your body at a distance seem to you now?
8. Tell me more about it.
9. How does no-distance seem to you now?
10. Tell me more about it.
11. How does no-matter seem to you now?
12. How does no-space seem to you now?
13. How does no-energy seem to you now?
14. How does no-time seem to you now?
15. How does no-game seem to you now?
Jolted = to be shaken, jarred, or surprised by a sudden, rough, or violent force.
1-11
1. Grab your head with your hands.
2. Think the thought “I’m not going to lose at my interiorization lifestyle.”
3. Think the thought “I’m not going to lose my head or this game.”
1. Grab your knees with your hands.
5. Think the thought “I’m not going to lose my knees or this game.”
1.3.
1.3-1
1. Think the thought your body isn’t.
2. Think the thought your body is.
3. Think the thought your head isn’t.
4. Think the thought your head is.
5. Think the thought your back isn’t.
6. Think the thought your back is.
7. Think the thought your torso isn’t.
8. Think the thought your torso is.
9. Think the thought your legs aren’t.
10. Think the thought your legs are.
11. Think the thought your feet aren’t.
12. Think the thought your feet are.
13. Think the thought your hands aren’t.
14. Think the thought your hands are.
1.3-2
1. Think the thought your body is doing.
2. Think the thought your body isn’t doing.
1.3-3
1. Think the thought your body isn’t stable.
2. Think the thought your body is stable.
1.3-4
What would happen if you made no-distance disappear?
What would happen if you lost no-distance?
1.3-5
Look around here and tell me something you wouldn’t mind disappearing.
1.3-6
Think the thought “I’m going to lose everything.”
Think the thought “I’m going to lose nothing.”
Think the thought “Everything is mine.”
1.3-7
Think the thought “I’m going to lose all my memories.”
Think the thought “I’m going to lose nothing.”
Think the thought “Everything is mine.”
1.3-8
Think the thought “I’m going to lose my body.”
Think the thought “I’m going to lose nothing.”
Think the thought “Everything is mine.”
1.3-9
Think the thought “I’m going to lose what makes me me.”
Think the thought “I’m going to lose nothing.”
Think the thought “Everything is mine.”
1.3-10
1. Think the thought your head isn’t going to go away.
1.4
1.4-1
1. What about your body is not low quality?
2. What about your body is not damaged?
1.4-2
1. What body-related evaluation is?
2. Tell me about it.
3. What body-related evaluation isn’t?
4. Tell me about it.
1.4-3
1. Is communication with your body?
1. Isn’t communication with your body?
1.4-4
1. Is the matter, energy, space, time and location where you are?
2. Isn’t the matter, energy, space, time and location where you are?
1.4-4
1. How would losing your head be acceptable?
2. How would losing your head be unacceptable?
3. For what reason might you lose your head?
4. Grab your head, say out loud “This location will be lost. The matter, energy, space, time and location is going to disappear.”
5. Grab your head, say out loud “This location will be kept. The matter, energy, space, time and location is fully stable.”
6. Where could there be an equally acceptable replacement head?
1.5. Location
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
1.5-1
1. What body is?
2. Tell me about it.
1. What body isn’t?
2. Tell me about it.
1.5-2
1. What distance is?
2. Tell me about it.
1. What distance isn’t?
2. Tell me about it.
1-5-3
1. What entrance is?
2. Tell me about it.
1. What entrance isn’t?
2. Tell me about it.
1.5-4
1. What location is?
2. Tell me about it.
1. What location isn’t?
2. Tell me about it.
1-5-5
1. Tell me a safe location.
2. Tell me about it.
1. Tell me an unsafe location.
2. Tell me about it.
1-5-6
What could you enter?
What could you exit?
What could you re-enter?
What could you re-exit?
1-5-7
How does entrance seem to you now?
How does exit seem to you now?
2. Sources
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
1. Tell me a source.
1. What would happen if you came to it?
2. What would happen if it came to you?
3. What would happen if you went away from it?
4. What would happen if it went away from you?
2. Tell me a source for another.
1. What would happen if they came to it?
2. What would happen if it came to them?
3. What would happen if they went away from it?
4. What would happen if it went away from them?
3. Tell me a source for others.
1. What would happen if they came to it?
2. What would happen if it came to them?
3. What would happen if they went away from it?
4. What would happen if it went away from them?
4. Tell me about yourself as a source.
1. What would happen if you came to it?
2. What would happen if it came to you?
3. What would happen if you went away from it?
4. What would happen if it went away from you?
3. Existence
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
3-1
1. What is?
2. What isn’t?
1. What is for another?
2. What isn’t for another?
1. What is for others?
2. What isn’t for others?
1. What is for yourself?
2. What isn’t for yourself?
3-2
1. Who is?
2. Who isn’t?
1. Who is for another?
2. Who isn’t for another?
1. Who is for others?
2. Who isn’t for others?
1. Who is for yourself?
2. Who isn’t for yourself?
3-3
1. What source is?
2. What source isn’t?
1. What source is for another?
2. What source isn’t for another?
1. What source is for others?
2. What source isn’t for others?
1. What source is for yourself?
2. What source isn’t for yourself?
3-4
1. What safety is?
2. What safety isn’t?
1. What safety is for another?
2. What safety isn’t for another?
1. What safety is for others?
2. What safety isn’t for others?
1. What safety is for yourself?
2. What safety isn’t for yourself?
4. Safety
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
(Do thoroughly)
4-0
What is safe about assuming a body?
What isn’t safe about assuming a body?
4-1
What isn’t safe for a body about being controlled by a being?
What is safe for a body about being controlled by a being?
4-2
How are you safe from your body’s location?
How is your body safe from your location?
4-3
How are you safe from your body’s position?
How is your body safe from your position?
4-4
How are you safe from the physical universe’s location?
How is the physical universe safe from your location?
4-5
How are you safe from the physical universe’s position?
How is the physical universe safe from your position?
4-6
1. How are you safe from the physical universe?
2. How is the physical universe safe from you?
3. How is another safe from the physical universe?
4. How is the physical universe safe from another?
5. How are others safe from the physical universe?
6. How is the physical universe safe from others?
7. How is the physical universe safe from the physical universe?
4-7 - 20-Part Safety - Important Process
1. How is your body safe from your body?
2. How are you safe from yourself?
3. How are you safe from your body?
4. How is your body safe from you?
5. How is another safe from your body?
6. How is your body safe from another?
7. How is another safe from their body?
8. How is another’s body safe from them?
9. How is another safe from you?
10. How are you safe from another?
11. How is another’s body safe from you?
12. How are you safe from another’s body?
13. How are others safe from your body?
14. How is your body safe from others?
15. How are others safe from their bodies?
16. How are others’ bodies safe from them?
17. How are others safe from you?
18. How are you safe from others?
19. How are others’ bodies safe from you?
20. How are you safe from others’ bodies?
4-8
1. How do the lies of your body being harmed by another seem to you now?
2. How do the lies of your another’s body being harmed seem to you now?
3. How do the lies of your others’ bodies being harmed seem to you now?
4. How do the lies of your body being harmed by yourself seem to you now?
4-9
1. How do the lies of your body being unsafe by another seem to you now?
2. How do the lies of your another’s body being unsafe seem to you now?
3. How do the lies of your others’ bodies being unsafe seem to you now?
4. How do the lies of your body being unsafe from yourself seem to you now?
5. Exteriorizing by body parts and attention and relation and distance
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
5-1 - Important Process
1. Where would your head be safe?
2. Where would your head find you safe?
3. Where would your back be safe?
4. Where would your back find you safe?
5. Where would your legs be safe?
6. Where would your legs find you safe?
7. How close does your head seem to you now?
8. How close does your back seem to you now?
9. How close do your legs seem to you now?
10. From where can you have all of your attention on your head?
11. From where can you have none of your attention on your head?
12. From where can you have all of your attention on your back?
13. From where can you have none of your attention on your back?
14. From where can you have all of your attention on your legs?
15. From where can you have none of your attention on your legs?
16. Where could you be located?
17. Be 30 feet back of your head.
18. Try not to be 30 feet back of your head.
19. Be 30 feet in front of your head.
20. Try not to be 30 feet in front of your head.
5-2
1. What body part are you not relative to?
2. What body part is not relative to you?
3. What body are you not relative to?
4. What body is not relative to you?
5-3
1. What universe are you not relative to?
2. What universe is not relative to you?
5-4
1. What distance wouldn’t you mind making nothing of?
2. What distance wouldn’t you mind making longer?
3. What distance could you tolerate to your brain?
4. What distance could your brain tolerate to a being?
5. How far from your body could you be while it still being unharmed?
6. How far from your body could you be while you still being unharmed?
6. Present Space - This and previous and maybe other universes’ space
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
6-1
1. Where could you find present space safe?
2. Where could present space find you safe?
6-2
1. Where could you find present time safe?
2. Where could present time find you safe?
6-3
Where could you find present matter safe?
Where could present matter find you safe?
6-4
Where could you find present energy safe?
Where could present energy find you safe?
6-5
How is present space safe to you now?
How is present space safe from you now?
How is present space safe to others now?
How is present space safe from others now?
How is present space safe to another now?
How is present space safe from another now?
How is your present space safe to you now?
How is your present space safe from you now?
6-6
How does present space seem to you now?
How does present space seem to others now?
How does present space seem to another now?
How does your present space seem to you now?
7. Loss
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
7-1
1. How does past loss seem to you now?
2. How does present loss seem to you now?
7-2
1. Look around here and tell me something you wouldn’t lose if you’re located along with your body.
2. Look around here and tell me something you wouldn’t lose if you're located far from your body.
8. Independence
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
(Done exterior.)
1. Look around here and tell me something you’re not relative to
2. Look around here and tell me something that’s not relative to you
9.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
In what way would exteriorizing not interfere with the game you’re playing?
10. Harmful acts
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
10-1
1. What’s the worst position you can think of yourself being in regards to your own harmful acts?
2. What’s the greatest exposition others could do to you in relation to your harmful acts?
10-2
1. What’s the worst position you can think of others being in regards to their harmful acts?
2. What’s the greatest exposition you could do to others in relation to their harmful acts?
11. Barriers
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
1. Tell me a barrier.
2. Tell me about it.
3. Tell me a non-barrier.
4. Tell me about it.
F2. 1. Tell me a barrier for another.
2. Tell me about it.
3. Tell me a non-barrier for another.
4. Tell me about it.
F3. 1. Tell me a barrier for others.
2. Tell me about it.
3. Tell me a non-barrier for others.
4. Tell me about it.
F0. 1. Tell me about yourself as a barrier.
2. Tell me about it.
3. Tell me about yourself as a non-barrier.
4. Tell me about it.
12.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
How does the one life lie seem to you now?
13.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Where would you be truly safe?
Where would you be truly in danger?
14.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Where would game complexities be safe from you?
15.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
1. What about the physical universe is low-quality?
2. What about the physical universe is high-quality?
3. What about the physical universe is low-quantity?
4. What about the physical universe is high-quantity?
16.
(When exterior)
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
16-1
Look around here and tell me something you can remember.
Look around here and tell me something you can forget.
16-2
What is worse than remembering?
17.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
17-1
Tell me a spot that's safe to look at?
17-2
What is worse than looking at the physical universe?
18
What is your body a solution to?
What is the physical universe a solution to?
What is creating a body a solution to?
What is creating sex a solution to?
What is creating a group a solution to?
What is creating a mankind a solution to?
What is creating a life forms a solution to?
What is creating a the physical universe a solution to?
What is creating spirits a solution to?
What is creating God a solution to?
Does creating ... seem to be persisting
19. “Expectations”
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
How do you have high expectations for your life?
How do you not have high expectations for your life?
20. “Everything”
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
(Do 6+ passes per item, per person. Can be done in stars, perhaps in other universes)
1. How does duplicating everything seem to you now?
2. Does anything anywhere seem to be persisting?
3. How do the lies of unhappiness seem to you now?
4. How do the lies of worsening seem to you now?
5. How do the lies of communication seem to you now?
6. How do the lies of problems seem to you now?
7. How do the lies of your sin seem to you now?
8. How do the lies of upsets seem to you now?
9. How does past loss seem to you now?
10. How do the lies of disability seem to you now?
11. How do sources seem to you now?
12. How do the lies of unsafety seem to you now?
13. How do the lies of destruction seem to you now?
14. How does the foundation of your automatic reactivity seem to you now?
15. How do the lies of automatic mechanisms seem to you now?
16. How do the lies of exteriorization blocks related to distance seem to you now?
17. How do games of interiorization seem to you now?
18. How do the lies of unintelligence of the physical universe seem to you now?
19. How do the lies of your current game seem to you now?
Reference - all exteriorization techniques
List of all exteriorization techniques
Best ones
1. Where are you from? (or aren't)
2. Safety
3. Interest/attention on the exterior environment
4. Spanning attention
5. Easy/pleasant location
6. Handling body consideration
Worst ones
1. Exterior from mockups
2. Assertive location commands. (Be 3 feet back of your head. Try not to be 3 feet back of your head.)
List of all exteriorization techniques
Exterior from mockups
Assertive location commands. (Be 3 feet back of your head. Try not to be 3 feet back of your head.)
Spot spots in space
Exteriorize from spots
Where are you from?
Spanning attention
Exteriorization by Distance
Exteriorization by Distance ("How close" variant)
Exteriorization by Distance (Nothing / Something)
Safety
Beingness processing (self identifying with an object)
Holding spots/anchor points
Interest/attention on the exterior environment
Conceving a static
Accept/Reject
Keep head from going away
Loss
Control (Can and can't)
Where you're not located
Int/Ext handling of some form
Handling body consideration
Handling negative case
Things you're separate from
Having other things connect with you
Easy/pleasant location
What is worse than exteriorizing?
How could you trap yourself?
Exteriorization by intelligence (new idea)
Duplicating exteriorization inhibition
Duplicating exteriorization inhibition by section (What can't you duplicate)
As-ising exteriorization inhibition
Exteriorization by non-interference with current game
All/no attention on X
Where could you be located
Not relative to you
Where aren't you now?
Easy to be located / difficult to be located
What could you use to locate yourself?
A word is just a symbol of a philosophy. A language is a philosophy of combining symbols of other philosophies (using grammar).
I mean this very strictly. Every word is a philosophy. For example, man, cat, Platonism, go, grocery, sarcasm, ecstacy, etc.
Foundation of concept
1. That which invariably exists
2. That which invariably doesn't exist
3. Potential directionality
4. Mandatory directionality
Note that “exists” and “directionality” means exists in a hypothetical universe, or more foundational than any universe, it is using ontology in a very basic sense.
I think a word can have zero mandatory directions. Maybe.
Relations can be things that exist.
The earlier item is more important and forms a greater extent of the full composition of the philosophy of a word, which is the meaning of a word.
Now, in practice, the usage of these concepts can change. For example, for “attack,” this mandates that certain things do exist (in the range of possibilities for which the word would be applicable),
certain things don't exist, and certain directions are potential, and certain directions are mandatory
When some things “Attack a lion,” he may think the lion to the left. When someone thinks “Attack a grasshopper,” he may think the grasshopper under him.
This is because the directionality is potential, and the fundamental elements of the concept (these 4, at least), get “colored” (or filled in) with additional details in a given instantiation.
Now, the word itself just means the fundamental details. Anything not fundamental is optional, but it's still the word.
A green or blue thing can be attacked. A large or small thing can be attacked. A galaxy here or there can be attacked. A real or fictional thing can be attacked.
By analyzing these 4 factors for small, common words, a tremendous amount of understanding could be developed.
Words often have associations or “coloring,” which are vastly more complex than the foundation. For example, a woman might think of “rape” and always add vastly more complexity to the concept, due to a personal experience.
Actually, this is a low mental state.
To be able to strip words from instantiations, at will, would be an extremely high order ability.
For example, “exteriorize,” “locate,” “static,” etc., should be very simple ideas. Instead, people often have difficulties. If one didn't, then one would exteriorize right there.
This leads one to conclude that everyone has misunderstood words, since understanding of words is essentially nearly impossible for anyone.
Word clearing can help with this. To some extent.
Therefore, understanding of words is essentially impossible if one is aberrated.
If one is aberrated, one always has misunderstood words.
Word clearing alone, could exteriorize someone. If someone word cleared “being,” “static,” etc., and they ACTUALLY cleared it up.
Any complex idea (sarcasm, justice, etc.), can be made in very, very, very simple forms, just using these 4 essential points. Just simple scenes.
For example
“Man”
Existence - Male body, physical object somewhere, etc. (these have to exist)
Non existence - obliteration, disappearence, etc. (these can't exist)
Potential Dir. Potentially moving, running, flying, teleporting (might be possible), etc.
Man. Dir. Only relative ones (blood flow, atoms, etc.) under certain forms of a “Man” (assuming human, etc.)
Sloppy descriptions of common words (not complete, not perfect)
I should make a big dictionary of this. I wonder if this has been done
Now, it would be quite interesting having a being mock these up repeatedly. Would be very interesting spiritual processing.
# Being
**Existence**
A fundamental experiencing/causative unit.
Identity independent of physical form.
Awareness or potential awareness.
**Non-existence**
Complete absence of a viewpoint.
Total dependence on physical form as the source of identity.
**Potential Directionality**
Attention toward or away from things.
Creation, consideration, or intention.
Interaction with forms or experiences.
**Mandatory Directionality**
Awareness → experience.
Cause/source → effects or manifestations.
# Democracy
**Existence**
* Multiple decision-making units.
* A governing structure.
* A relation between units and governing structure.
**Non-existence**
* One independent source of authority.
* Complete separation between governed and governing.
**Potential Directionality**
* Units → governing structure (influence, selection).
* Governing structure → units (decisions, organization).
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Collective → authority.
* Authority derives from the collective.
-----------------------
# Matter
**Existence**
* Persistent entities.
* Occupation of extension.
* Distinction between parts.
**Non-existence**
* Pure absence of entity.
* No extension.
* No persistence.
**Potential Directionality**
* Movement.
* Combination.
* Separation.
* Transformation.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Entity exists as a distinguishable form.
-----------------------
# Energy
**Existence**
* Capacity for change.
* A system in a state.
* A relation allowing transformation.
**Non-existence**
* Absolute inability to change.
* No difference between possible states.
**Potential Directionality**
* Transfer.
* Conversion.
* Concentration.
* Dispersion.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* State difference → possible transformation.
-----------------------
# Space
**Existence**
* Distinct positions.
* Relations between positions.
* Separation.
**Non-existence**
* No distinction of location.
* No spatial relation.
**Potential Directionality**
* Movement.
* Expansion.
* Contraction.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Things can have relative position.
-----------------------
# Time
**Existence**
* Events/states.
* Sequence.
* Change.
**Non-existence**
* No before/after relation.
* No distinction between states.
**Potential Directionality**
* Change.
* Ordering.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Earlier → later.
-----------------------
# Form
**Existence**
* Identity.
* Arrangement of parts.
* Structure.
**Non-existence**
* No distinction of arrangement.
* No identity.
**Potential Directionality**
* Alteration.
* Reorganization.
* Deformation.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Parts exist in relation.
-----------------------
# Life
**Existence**
* Self-maintaining organization.
* Internal processes.
* Continuation.
**Non-existence**
* No self-maintaining process.
* Complete absence of internal activity.
**Potential Directionality**
* Growth.
* Reproduction.
* Adaptation.
* Decline.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Internal process → continued existence.
-----------------------
# Mind
**Existence**
* Perspective.
* Internal representation.
* Experience.
**Non-existence**
* No perspective.
* No internal state.
**Potential Directionality**
* Thinking.
* Remembering.
* Imagining.
* Choosing.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Representation exists relative to an experiencer.
-----------------------
# Number
**Existence**
* Distinct units.
* Quantity relation.
* Identity of units.
**Non-existence**
* No distinction.
* No quantity.
**Potential Directionality**
* Addition.
* Subtraction.
* Ordering.
* Comparison.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Units exist as countable relations.
-----------------------
# Sarcasm
**Existence**
* Communication.
* Surface meaning.
* Intended meaning.
* Difference between them.
**Non-existence**
* Complete agreement between expressed and intended meaning.
**Potential Directionality**
* Humor.
* Criticism.
* Emphasis.
* Social signaling.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Expressed meaning → hidden/intended meaning.
-----------------------
# Love
**Existence**
* Experiencer.
* Object of relation.
* Positive valuation.
**Non-existence**
* Complete indifference.
* Absence of relation.
**Potential Directionality**
* Attention.
* Protection.
* Giving.
* Joining.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Experiencer → valued object.
-----------------------
# Affinity
**Existence**
* Two or more entities.
* Similarity or attraction relation.
**Non-existence**
* Complete absence of connection.
**Potential Directionality**
* Increasing closeness.
* Decreasing closeness.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Entities share a relation of attraction/similarity.
-----------------------
# Reality
**Existence**
* A totality of what is.
* Relations between existences.
**Non-existence**
* Absolute nothing.
**Potential Directionality**
* Change.
* Discovery.
* Interaction.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Existence exists independently of any single perspective.
-----------------------
# Communication
**Existence**
* Sender/source.
* Receiver.
* Information pattern.
**Non-existence**
* No information relation.
**Potential Directionality**
* Encoding.
* Transmission.
* Interpretation.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Information → receiver.
-----------------------
# Understanding
**Existence**
* Concept.
* Knower.
* Relation between them.
**Non-existence**
* Mere symbol without meaning.
* No conceptual connection.
**Potential Directionality**
* Learning.
* Refinement.
* Integration.
**Mandatory Directionality**
* Symbol/experience → internal concept.
Small common words below (much in common with NSM theory, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_semantic_metalanguage)
# 1. I
**Existence**
* A perspective point.
* An experiencing/acting unit.
**Non-existence**
* No perspective point.
**Potential directionality**
* Can perceive.
* Can act.
* Can think.
**Mandatory directionality**
* None.
-----------------------
## 2. YOU
**Existence**
* A second perspective point.
* Distinct from “I.”
**Non-existence**
* No other point of reference.
**Potential directionality**
* Can communicate.
* Can act.
* Can affect.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Relation: I ↔ you.
-----------------------
## 3. SOMEONE
**Existence**
* A being.
* Agency/perspective.
**Non-existence**
* No being.
**Potential directionality**
* Can do.
* Can perceive.
* Can communicate.
**Mandatory directionality**
* None.
-----------------------
## 4. SOMETHING
**Existence**
* An entity.
**Non-existence**
* Absolute nothing.
**Potential directionality**
* Can relate.
* Can change.
* Can be located.
**Mandatory directionality**
* None.
-----------------------
## 5. BODY
**Existence**
* Physical form.
* Parts.
* Boundary.
**Non-existence**
* No physical extension.
**Potential directionality**
* Movement.
* Change.
* Interaction.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Parts exist within a whole.
-----------------------
## 6. DO
**Existence**
* Actor.
* Action/event.
**Non-existence**
* Pure absence of activity.
**Potential directionality**
* Any transformation.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Actor → action.
-----------------------
## 7. HAPPEN
**Existence**
* Event.
* Before/after distinction.
**Non-existence**
* No event.
**Potential directionality**
* Any change.
**Mandatory directionality**
* State A → State B.
-----------------------
## 8. MOVE
**Existence**
* Thing.
* Position/state.
* Difference between positions/states.
**Non-existence**
* No transition.
**Potential directionality**
* Any path.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Previous state → new state.
-----------------------
## 9. THINK
**Existence**
* Thinker.
* Thought/content.
**Non-existence**
* No mental content.
**Potential directionality**
* Combine.
* Compare.
* Imagine.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Thinker → thought.
-----------------------
## 10. KNOW
**Existence**
* Knower.
* Known.
**Non-existence**
* Complete absence of relation.
**Potential directionality**
* Learn.
* Forget.
* Recall.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Known → knower (information relation).
-----------------------
## 11. WANT
**Existence**
* Someone.
* Desired state/object.
**Non-existence**
* No preference/direction.
**Potential directionality**
* Attempt.
* Pursuit.
* Avoidance.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Present state → desired state.
-----------------------
## 12. FEEL
**Existence**
* Experiencer.
* Internal state.
**Non-existence**
* No experience.
**Potential directionality**
* Change intensity.
* Become different.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Experience exists relative to experiencer.
-----------------------
## 13. SEE
**Existence**
* Observer.
* Visible thing.
* Relation.
**Non-existence**
* No visual relation.
**Potential directionality**
* Attention.
* Movement of observer/object.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Object → observer (visual information).
-----------------------
## 14. HEAR
**Existence**
* Hearer.
* Sound/event.
**Non-existence**
* No sound relation.
**Potential directionality**
* Sound source changes.
* Attention changes.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Sound source → hearer.
-----------------------
## 15. SAY
**Existence**
* Speaker.
* Message.
**Non-existence**
* No communicated content.
**Potential directionality**
* Any message.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Speaker → listener/message.
-----------------------
## 16. NOT
**Existence**
* A concept being considered.
* A relation of exclusion.
**Non-existence**
* The presence of the excluded thing.
**Potential directionality**
* Can negate any concept.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Concept → exclusion of concept.
-----------------------
## 17. MAYBE
**Existence**
* Possibility space.
* Multiple possible states.
**Non-existence**
* Absolute certainty.
**Potential directionality**
* Any possible outcome.
**Mandatory directionality**
* None.
-----------------------
## 18. IF
**Existence**
* Condition.
* Possible result.
**Non-existence**
* No relation between condition and result.
**Potential directionality**
* Condition may lead to many outcomes.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Condition → consequence relation.
-----------------------
## 19. BECAUSE
**Existence**
* Cause.
* Effect.
* Relation.
**Non-existence**
* Effect without causal relation.
**Potential directionality**
* Different causal chains.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Cause → effect.
-----------------------
## 20. BEFORE
**Existence**
* Two events/states.
* Order relation.
**Non-existence**
* No ordering.
**Potential directionality**
* Events can vary.
**Mandatory directionality**
* A → B in time order.
-----------------------
## 21. AFTER
**Existence**
* Two events/states.
* Order relation.
**Non-existence**
* No earlier event.
**Potential directionality**
* Events can vary.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Earlier → later.
-----------------------
## 22. NOW
**Existence**
* A reference point in sequence.
**Non-existence**
* No present reference.
**Potential directionality**
* Past.
* Future.
**Mandatory directionality**
* None.
-----------------------
## 23. WHERE
**Existence**
* Thing.
* Location relation.
**Non-existence**
* No location relation.
**Potential directionality**
* Movement.
* Relocation.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Thing ↔ location.
-----------------------
## 24. HERE
**Existence**
* Reference location.
* Observer/reference point.
**Non-existence**
* No reference location.
**Potential directionality**
* Movement away/toward.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Location relative to reference point.
-----------------------
## 25. THERE
**Existence**
* A location distinct from reference.
**Non-existence**
* No separation of locations.
**Potential directionality**
* Movement toward/away.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Reference point → other location.
-----------------------
## 26. INSIDE
**Existence**
* Container/boundary.
* Contained thing.
**Non-existence**
* No enclosing relation.
**Potential directionality**
* Enter.
* Exit.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Thing exists within boundary.
-----------------------
## 27. ABOVE
**Existence**
* Two things.
* Vertical relation.
**Non-existence**
* No relative position.
**Potential directionality**
* Movement upward/downward.
**Mandatory directionality**
* One thing is higher relative to another.
-----------------------
## 28. BELOW
**Existence**
* Two things.
* Vertical relation.
**Non-existence**
* No vertical comparison.
**Potential directionality**
* Up/down movement.
**Mandatory directionality**
* One thing is lower relative to another.
-----------------------
## 29. NEAR
**Existence**
* Two things.
* Distance relation.
**Non-existence**
* Infinite separation.
**Potential directionality**
* Approach.
* Separation.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Distance is small relative to a standard.
-----------------------
## 30. FAR
**Existence**
* Two things.
* Distance relation.
**Non-existence**
* Immediate contact/proximity.
**Potential directionality**
* Approach.
* Separation.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Distance is large relative to a standard.
-----------------------
## 31. GOOD
**Existence**
* Evaluator.
* Something evaluated.
* Standard/value.
**Non-existence**
* No comparison standard.
**Potential directionality**
* Increase/decrease value.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Evaluation → positive judgment.
-----------------------
## 32. BAD
**Existence**
* Evaluator.
* Something evaluated.
* Standard/value.
**Non-existence**
* No evaluation.
**Potential directionality**
* Avoidance.
* Correction.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Evaluation → negative judgment.
-----------------------
## 33. BIG
**Existence**
* Thing.
* Comparison scale.
**Non-existence**
* No size relation.
**Potential directionality**
* Growth.
* Shrinking.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Thing exceeds reference size.
-----------------------
## 34. SMALL
**Existence**
* Thing.
* Comparison scale.
**Non-existence**
* No size relation.
**Potential directionality**
* Growth.
* Shrinking.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Thing is below reference size.
-----------------------
## 35. ONE
**Existence**
* Unit.
* Identity.
**Non-existence**
* Multiplicity.
**Potential directionality**
* Division.
* Combination.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Single identity.
-----------------------
## 36. TWO
**Existence**
* Two units.
* Distinction.
**Non-existence**
* Complete unity.
**Potential directionality**
* Separation.
* Joining.
**Mandatory directionality**
* One + one.
Continuing. I will keep them as **minimal conceptual skeletons** rather than ordinary definitions.
-----------------------
## 37. SAME
**Existence**
* Two or more things.
* A shared identity/property/relation.
**Non-existence**
* Complete absence of commonality.
**Potential directionality**
* Comparison.
* Recognition.
**Mandatory directionality**
* A ↔ B share something.
-----------------------
## 38. DIFFERENT
**Existence**
* Two or more things.
* A distinction.
**Non-existence**
* Complete identity.
**Potential directionality**
* Comparison.
* Separation.
**Mandatory directionality**
* A ≠ B.
-----------------------
## 39. OTHER
**Existence**
* A reference thing.
* Another thing.
**Non-existence**
* Only one undivided thing.
**Potential directionality**
* Relation.
* Comparison.
**Mandatory directionality**
* One thing is distinct from reference.
-----------------------
## 40. ALL
**Existence**
* A collection.
* A boundary of inclusion.
**Non-existence**
* Anything outside the collection.
**Potential directionality**
* Expansion or reduction of collection.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Every member included.
-----------------------
## 41. SOME
**Existence**
* A collection.
* At least one member.
**Non-existence**
* Total absence of members.
**Potential directionality**
* Increase/decrease quantity.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Partial inclusion.
-----------------------
## 42. MANY
**Existence**
* Multiple units.
* Quantity comparison.
**Non-existence**
* Single unit.
**Potential directionality**
* Increase/decrease.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Quantity exceeds small reference amount.
-----------------------
## 43. MORE
**Existence**
* Two quantities.
* Comparison.
**Non-existence**
* No quantity difference.
**Potential directionality**
* Increase/decrease.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Quantity A > quantity B.
-----------------------
## 44. LESS
**Existence**
* Two quantities.
* Comparison.
**Non-existence**
* No quantity difference.
**Potential directionality**
* Increase/decrease.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Quantity A < quantity B.
-----------------------
## 45. CAN
**Existence**
* An agent/thing.
* A possible action/state.
**Non-existence**
* Absolute impossibility.
**Potential directionality**
* Many possible outcomes.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Possibility relation exists.
-----------------------
## 46. MUST
**Existence**
* A condition.
* A required outcome.
**Non-existence**
* Alternative possibility.
**Potential directionality**
* Different paths before requirement.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Condition → unavoidable result.
-----------------------
## 47. TRUE
**Existence**
* Statement/concept.
* Reality or accepted structure it corresponds to.
**Non-existence**
* Contradiction with that structure.
**Potential directionality**
* Investigation.
* Verification.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Concept → matches reality/structure.
-----------------------
## 48. FALSE
**Existence**
* Statement/concept.
* Reality/structure.
**Non-existence**
* Correspondence.
**Potential directionality**
* Correction.
* Discovery.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Concept → does not match reality/structure.
-----------------------
## 49. LIVE
**Existence**
* Entity.
* Self-maintaining process.
**Non-existence**
* Complete absence of life process.
**Potential directionality**
* Growth.
* Change.
* Reproduction.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Internal activity continues.
-----------------------
## 50. DIE
**Existence**
* Living entity.
* Life process.
**Non-existence**
* Continuation of life process.
**Potential directionality**
* Decay.
* Transformation.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Life process → cessation.
-----------------------
## 51. MAKE
**Existence**
* Maker.
* Result.
* Process.
**Non-existence**
* Result without creation process.
**Potential directionality**
* Any method of production.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Maker/process → created thing.
-----------------------
## 52. USE
**Existence**
* User.
* Object.
* Purpose.
**Non-existence**
* No application of object.
**Potential directionality**
* Different purposes.
**Mandatory directionality**
* User → object toward purpose.
-----------------------
## 53. HAVE
**Existence**
* Possessor.
* Possessed thing.
* Relation.
**Non-existence**
* No possession relation.
**Potential directionality**
* Acquire.
* Lose.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Possessed thing is connected to possessor.
-----------------------
## 54. GIVE
**Existence**
* Source.
* Recipient.
* Transferable thing.
**Non-existence**
* No transfer.
**Potential directionality**
* Physical, informational, abstract transfer.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Source → recipient.
-----------------------
## 55. TAKE
**Existence**
* Receiver.
* Source.
* Thing transferred.
**Non-existence**
* No acquisition.
**Potential directionality**
* Different methods of obtaining.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Source → receiver.
-----------------------
## 56. CHANGE
**Existence**
* Thing.
* State A.
* State B.
**Non-existence**
* Complete sameness through time.
**Potential directionality**
* Any transformation.
**Mandatory directionality**
* State A → State B.
-----------------------
## 57. BECOME
**Existence**
* Initial state.
* New state.
**Non-existence**
* No transition.
**Potential directionality**
* Any new condition.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Before → after.
-----------------------
## 58. TRY
**Existence**
* Agent.
* Goal.
* Attempt.
**Non-existence**
* Guaranteed success.
**Potential directionality**
* Multiple attempts.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Agent → possible goal.
-----------------------
## 59. NEED
**Existence**
* Entity.
* Requirement.
* Desired/necessary condition.
**Non-existence**
* No requirement.
**Potential directionality**
* Acquisition.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Current state → required state.
-----------------------
## 60. WANT
**Existence**
* Someone.
* Desired state.
**Non-existence**
* Absence of preference.
**Potential directionality**
* Pursuit.
* Avoidance.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Present → preferred.
-----------------------
## 61. FEAR
**Existence**
* Experiencer.
* Possible threat.
**Non-existence**
* No perceived threat.
**Potential directionality**
* Avoidance.
* Escape.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Threat → negative valuation.
-----------------------
## 62. HELP
**Existence**
* Helper.
* Recipient.
* Difficulty/problem.
**Non-existence**
* No assistance relation.
**Potential directionality**
* Many methods of assistance.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Helper → recipient improvement.
-----------------------
## 63. LOVE
**Existence**
* Experiencer.
* Object/person.
* Positive valuation.
**Non-existence**
* Indifference or rejection.
**Potential directionality**
* Attention.
* Giving.
* Protection.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Experiencer → positive relation.
-----------------------
## 64. GOOD PERSON / KIND
**Existence**
* Agent.
* Other being.
* Positive action relation.
**Non-existence**
* Pure disregard/harm.
**Potential directionality**
* Helping.
* Caring.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Agent → beneficial effect.
-----------------------
## 65. WORD / SAY
**Existence**
* Symbol.
* Meaning.
* Communicator.
**Non-existence**
* Pure meaningless signal.
**Potential directionality**
* Communication.
* Interpretation.
**Mandatory directionality**
* Meaning transmitted through symbol.
